Legal Opinion
Bartel v. Tokyo Elec. Power Co.
District Court, S.D. California
Decided March 4, 2019No. Case Nos.: 18-CV-537 JLS (JLB)PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Hon. Janis L. Sammartino, United States District Judge
Presently before the Court is Defendant Tokyo Electric Power Company, Inc.'s *779("TEPCO") Motion to Dismiss, ("TEPCO MTD," ECF No. 20), and Defendant General Electric's ("GE") Motion to Dismiss, ("GE MTD," ECF No. 19). Plaintiffs have filed a Response in Opposition to TEPCO's Motion, ("Opp'n to TEPCO MTD," ECF No. 24), and to GE's Motion, ("Opp'n to GE MTD," ECF No. 23). TEPCO filed a Reply, ("TEPCO Reply," ECF No. 28), as did GE, ("GE Reply," ECF No. 27). Having reviewed the parties' arguments and the law, the Court rules as follows.
BACKGROUN…
2Cases cited63 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Foisie v. Worcester Polytechnic Inst.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2020
- Arizona Grain Incorporated v. Barkley Ag Enterprises LLCDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2019
- Byelick v. Ryvyl Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2024
- Cline v. Dan-Bunkering (America), Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2025
- In re California Gasoline Spot Market Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2021
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.