Estate of: I. Wilner Appeal of: Baker, L.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1ConcurrenceJustice Todd
I agree with the majority that the Probate, Estates and Fiduciaries Code does not mandate application of the rule, set forth in Hodgson’s Estate,1 that a party offering a lost will for probate must demonstrate its contents by the testimony of two witnesses. Yet, I would decline, at this juncture, to overrule Hodgson’s Estate in full, but, rather, would adopt a narrow exception thereto under the circumstances of this case. On that basis, I concur in the majority’s ultimate decision to remand for reinstatement of the orphans’ court’s order. My disagreements with the majority’s analysis follow.
Fi…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Commonwealth v. MaldonadoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Meyer v. Community College of Beaver CountySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Giant Eagle, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- Hodgson's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
- Estate of: I. Wilner Pet of: Baker, L.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014