People v. Icke
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BRUINIERS, J.
—Brian Steven Icke, a chiropractor, was convicted by jury of sexual penetration by fraudulent misrepresentation of professional purpose. (Pen. Code, § 289, subd. (d)(4); hereafter section 289(d)(4).) The jury found that Icke digitally penetrated a client for a sexual purpose during a chiropractic massage. Icke argues the trial court erred in rejecting a proposed jury instruction that would have stated he was not guilty of violating section 289(d)(4) if he penetrated the client against her will. We conclude this argument is foreclosed by People v. Robinson (2016) 63 Cal.4th…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People v. ColeCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- People v. RobinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016
- Boro v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- People v. OgunmolaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
- People v. STUEDEMANNCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Ivan Valdez Amador v. Merrick GarlandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
- People v. Perez-RoblesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2023
- People v. Perez-RoblesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2023
- People v. SommerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021