Legal Opinion
People v. STUEDEMANN
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 21, 2007No. D049020PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
McDONALD, Acting P. J.
A jury convicted defendant David Edward Stuedemann of rape by a foreign object on an unconscious person (Pen. Code, § 289, subd. (d)(3)) 1 and oral copulation on an unconscious person (§ 288a, subd. (f)(3)). The court suspended imposition of sentence and granted probation subject to numerous conditions, including a condition Stuedemann spend one year in county jail. On appeal, Stuedemann asserts the evidence was insufficient to support his convictions for those offenses because the uncontradicted evidence showed the victim, Griselda R., was not unconscious within…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- People v. RodriguezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- People v. EdwardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- People v. CiceroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- People v. HarrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- People v. MinkowskiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- People v. BabaaliCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- People v. PhamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Ivan Valdez Amador v. Merrick GarlandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
- People v. IckeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
- People v. LyuCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.