Commissioner v. Rabenold
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SWAN, Circuit Judge.
The taxpayers are husband and wife who filed a single joint return of their income for the year 1933, pursuant to section 51(b) (2) of the Revenue Act of 1932, 47 Stat. 188, 26 U.S.C.A. § 51(b) (2). Their return showed no tax liability but the commissioner’s audit disclosed a deficiency and a deficiency notice addressed to them both was mailed. The deficiency has been stipulated to be $3,578.59. Of the ordinary net income of the taxpayers, 85 per cent, was the husband’s and 15 per cent, the wife’s. In addition to ordinary net income the wife had a capital net gain of some…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Gould v. GouldSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Crooks v. HarrelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Cole v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1935
- Van Vleck v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1935
- Crowe v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1936
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Pesch v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1982
- United States v. RosebushDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1942
- Moore v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1941
- Linen Thread Co. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
- Commissioner v. UniackeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.