Legal Opinion

Commissioner v. Rabenold

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided January 8, 1940No. 184PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SWAN, Circuit Judge.

The taxpayers are husband and wife who filed a single joint return of their income for the year 1933, pursuant to section 51(b) (2) of the Revenue Act of 1932, 47 Stat. 188, 26 U.S.C.A. § 51(b) (2). Their return showed no tax liability but the commissioner’s audit disclosed a deficiency and a deficiency notice addressed to them both was mailed. The deficiency has been stipulated to be $3,578.59. Of the ordinary net income of the taxpayers, 85 per cent, was the husband’s and 15 per cent, the wife’s. In addition to ordinary net income the wife had a capital net gain of some…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Gould v. GouldSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  2. Crooks v. HarrelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  3. Cole v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1935
  4. Van Vleck v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1935
  5. Crowe v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1936

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Pesch v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1982
  2. United States v. RosebushDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1942
  3. Moore v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1941
  4. Linen Thread Co. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
  5. Commissioner v. UniackeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API