Legal Opinion · Dissent

Commissioner v. Uniacke

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided December 31, 1942No. 80Published

1DissentL. Hand, Circuit Judge

Although, when spouses file a joint return, the statute requires the tax to be “computed on the aggregate income,” my brothers believe that neither taxpayer is liable for the tax so returned. They believe that each spouse is only liable for another tax which not only appears no*784where upon the return, but cannot even be calculated from it, for it does not separate the two incomes fused. It follows that the Commissioner cannot use the tax returned either to distrain or to sue; unless the spouses consent to pay, he must undertake an independent inquiry from sources not disclosed in the return; he…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Taft v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Helvering v. JanneySupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. Cole v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1935
  4. Crowe v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1936
  5. Commissioner v. RabenoldCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API