Dickens v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins.
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Chambliss
This is a bill in equity to reform a fire insurance policy so as to include the wife with the husband in the descrip tion or designation of the assured, and to recover for a loss by fire of the building described therein, located on land owned by the husband and wife as tenants by the entirety. The chancellor granted the relief under the special facts appearing. His decree was reversed by the Court of Appeals. This court granted certiorari and has heard argument.
The facts are clearly and fully stated by the chancellor. We quote from his opinion as follows:
“(1) Complainants, Oscar Dickens and…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Grimes v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Alfred v. Bankers' Shippers' Ins. Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1934
- Gleason v. Prudential Fire InsuranceTennessee Supreme Court · 1912
- Walker v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1925
- Cooley v. East & West InsuranceTennessee Supreme Court · 1933
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- DeFord v. National Life & Accident Ins.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1945
- Henry v. Southern Fire & Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1958
- E. K. Hardison Seed Co. v. Continental Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1966
- Sikora v. VanderploegCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2006
- Vulcan Life & Accident Insurance Company v. SegarsTennessee Supreme Court · 1965
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.