Legal Opinion

Gleason v. Prudential Fire Insurance

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1912PublishedCited by 21 opinions

FROM KNOX -Appeal from the Chancery Court of Knox County.— «Tames Maynard, «Te., Special Chancellor.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Green

This bill was filed by the complainant, claiming to be a creditor of defendant insurance company, and seeking to recover the amount alleged to be due him under a policy of insurance which had been issued to' him. The bill was also filed as a general creditors’bill, alleging the insolvency of the company, and asking for< the appointment of a receiver, and that its affairs’ be wound up under the supervision of the chancery court.

A receiver was appointed for the company, and, publication was made for creditors, and numerous intervening petitions were filed in the cause.

A final decree was passed…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. GalbraithTennessee Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Alexander v. Continental Insurance Co. of New YorkWisconsin Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Commonwealth v. Massachusetts Mutual Fire InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875
  4. Dale v. Continental InsuranceTennessee Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Kenton Ins. v. WiggintonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1889

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Baird v. Fidelity-Phenix Fire Ins. Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1942
  2. In Re Estate of HaskinsCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2006
  3. Going v. GoingTennessee Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Public Housing Admin. v. Housing Auth. of BogalusaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1961
  5. Dickens v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1936

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API