Legal Opinion

Eastman v. Farmers State Bank of Olivia

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided September 28, 1928No. 26,790PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHilton, J.

Appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiffs.

Plaintiffs were tenants in common of a 320-acre farm in Ren-ville county encumbered by a mortgage for $17,365, due in February, 1926. There was also a ditch lien against the property of $3,013.10. Plaintiffs arranged with the Farmers State Bank of Olivia, of which they were not regular customers, to procure for them a loan on said farm in the snm of $17,000 and, in’ writing’, authorized the bank to represent them in connection therewith. The purpose of the loan was to pay off the ditch lien and apply the balance thereof toward the discharge of the…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. National Bank v. Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
  2. Peters v. BainSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  3. McLeod v. EvansWisconsin Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Woodhouse v. CrandallIllinois Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Independent District v. KingSupreme Court of Iowa · 1890

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Winkler v. VeigelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
  2. Taylor v. Corning Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1932
  3. Forsythe v. First State Bank Ex Rel. PeytonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
  4. Paul v. Farmers & Merchants State BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
  5. Bauck v. First State BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API