Legal Opinion

United States v. Wilbert Williams

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided November 11, 1965No. 16110_1PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHN W. PECK, Judge.

The first question raised on this appeal from defendant-appellant’s conviction is concerned with the language appearing in a search warrant procured before arresting officers entered the premises in question. An examination of that warrant shows it to have been based on information received by the agent that appellant “kept a ready supply of heroin on hand in the [his] apartment.” Appellant argues that the use of the past tense verb “kept” does not indicate a presently continuing circumstance and that an ambiguity existed under which it might not be clear that the affiant…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. United States v. RabinowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  5. Miller v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. People v. BradleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Samuel Rosencranz v. United States of America, Anthony Dipietro v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1966
  3. United States v. MurrayCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
  4. United States v. Patrick C. Remigio, A/K/A Joe CuervoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
  5. United States v. Maurice KempCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API