Legal Opinion

United States v. Maurice Kemp

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided January 14, 1994No. 93-3044PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge GINSBURG.

Concurring opinion filed by Circuit Judge WALD.

GINSBURG, Circuit Judge:

The Government appeals a district court order granting the defendant’s motion to suppress physical evidence on the ground that it was seized in violation of the federal knock and announce statute, 18 U.S.C. § 3109. We hold that the officer’s entry into the premises to be searched when the door *1141opened under the force of his knock was not a “breaking” subject to the requirements of that law, and therefore we reverse the suppression order.

I. BACKGROUND

A Metropolitan Police…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Miller v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. United States v. Francisco Bustamante-Gamez, United States of America v. Abelardo Garcia-RamirezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
  3. United States v. Joseph Bonner, United States of America v. James TurnerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989
  4. United States v. Thomas D. HarrisCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970
  5. Keiningham v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1960

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. United States v. James H. Spikes (96-3899) Marilyn Smith (96-3660)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
  2. Adcock v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1998
  3. United States v. Gary Dewayne PinsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
  4. United States v. James Ray MendozaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002
  5. State v. RichardsWashington Supreme Court · 1998

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API