Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Dingwell

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided July 30, 1975No. CM 431946PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

O’DONNELL, Judge:

Contrary to his pleas, the appellant was convicted of wrongfully possessing heroin in violation of Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 934. He was sentenced to be discharged from the service with a bad-conduct discharge, to forfeit all pay and allowances, and to be confined at hard labor for six months. The convening authority approved the sentence as adjudged.

The appellant contends before us, as he did at trial, that the heroin was the subject of an illegal search and seizure and therefore inadmissible. The military judge denied the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  5. Brown v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States v. MartinU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1977
  2. United States v. WeekleyU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1977
  3. United States v. BowlesU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1979
  4. United States v. McCulloughU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1981
  5. United States v. BarrettU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1981

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API