United States v. McCullough
U S Air Force Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION
ARROWOOD, Senior Judge:
The accused questions the legality of a customs search of the compartment of the train in which he was riding as it crossed an international border. We find he had no standing to contest the legality of the search of the common areas in the compartment. We also hold that the Government met its heavy burden to demonstrate that the accused knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily waived his right to a lawyer before making a statement even though he had asked to see a lawyer when he was first advised of that right.
The accused was traveling by train from Holland to…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- North Carolina v. ButlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. SalvucciSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. PereiraU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1982
- United States v. McCulloughUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983