Legal Opinion

Watson v. Rosewell

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 23, 1998No. 1—96—3709PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRESIDING JUSTICE BUCKLEY

delivered the opinion of the court:

This is an appeal brought by petitioner David Watson (Watson) from a trial court order denying his petition for relief under the indemnity provisions of the Revenue Act of 1939, as amended (now known as the Property Tax Code (35 ILCS 200/21 — 305 (West 1994))). Watson lost his property to a tax deed after his redemption payment was expunged by the trial court in a collateral tax deed proceeding, as being less than the full amount needed for redemption. Watson sought indemnification. The trial court found that Watson was not entitled…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Florsheim v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  2. People Ex Rel. Partee v. MurphyIllinois Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Garcia v. RosewellAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976
  4. Cosmopolitan National Bank v. Oak Park BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987
  5. Mutual Life Ins. Co. of New York v. ChambersAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Prince v. RosewellAppellate Court of Illinois · 2001
  2. Accuracy Firearms, LLC v. PritzkerAppellate Court of Illinois · 2023
  3. Application of County TreasurerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999
  4. In re Application of County TreasurerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999
  5. In re Application of the Cook County CollectorAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API