Legal Opinion

Prince v. Rosewell

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 16, 2001No. 1 — 99—2879PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Theis

Petitioner Ralph Prince’s property was sold at a tax sale after he failed to timely redeem it. The trial court denied his petition for equitable relief under the indemnity provision of the Property Tax Code (the Code) (35 ILCS 200/21 — 305 (West 1998)) and denied his motion for reconsideration. Petitioner contends on appeal that the trial court applied an incorrect standard in denying him relief from the indemnity fund, that the trial court’s findings were unsupported by the evidence and, therefore, its decision was an abuse of discretion, and that the trial court erred in preventing him from…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Howard v. Zack Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1994
  2. In Re Application of Kane County CollectorAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985
  3. Limanowski v. Ashland Oil Co., Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1995
  4. Kirk v. RosewellAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992
  5. In Re Application of Cook County CollectorAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In re Application of the County CollectorAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003
  2. Malmloff v. KerrIllinois Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Malmloff v. County TreasurerAppellate Court of Illinois · 2006
  4. In Re County Collector of Lake CountyAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003
  5. Lakefront Plumbing & Heating, Inc. v. PappasAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API