Legal Opinion

Davis v. Seattle National Bank

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 2, 1898No. 2784PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, King County. — lion. Obange Jacobs, Jndge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Scott, C. J.

Plaintiff brought this action upon an assigned claim to recover for services performed by one Wheeler as an attorney at law for the Commercial National Bank of Seattle. On November 22, 1894, said bank, desiring to retire from business, entered into an arrangement with the Seattle National Bank, the defendant here, whereby it transferred all its assets to this defendant as security for moneys advanced by it to pay the indebtedness of the Commercial National Bank as shown by its books, amounting to $68,576.44. It is not claimed that the books…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Seattle National Bank v. CarterWashington Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Allen v. Olympia Light & Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Corbitt v. HarringtonWashington Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Austin v. WilsonSuperior Court of Buffalo · 1890
  5. Bradley Fertilizer Co. v. South Publishing Co.New York Court of Common Pleas · 1892

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Irwin v. HolbrookWashington Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Nance v. ValentineWashington Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Betcher v. KunzWashington Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Bowers v. GoodWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Cooper v. UptonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1906

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API