Austin v. Wilson
Superior Court of Buffalo
Appeal from municipal court. Action by James C. Austin against 0. Townsend Wilson for mill supplies. There was a judgment in plaintiff’s favor, and defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtHatch, J.
The substantial facts upon which the judgment in this action is based, are conceded. Plaintiff is a dealer in engine supplies, and defendant is the proprietor of a steam planing-mill. On February 16, 1888, plaintiff was informed by a person in his employ that the engineer of defendant’s mill had ordered some packing, and thereupon he filled the order, and delivered the packing at defendant’s mill, leaving it in the engine-room. Two or three months after, plaintiff sent by mail a bill of the packing to defendant, which he received, but gave it no attention. Subsequently, three or four other…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- The People v. . Bank of North AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
- Volkening v. . DegraafNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
- Quincey v. . WhiteNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
- Field v. . KnappNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
- Rouse v. WhitedNew York Court of Appeals · 1862
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bennett v. PotterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Davis v. Seattle National BankWashington Supreme Court · 1898
- Stimson Mill Co. v. Hughes Manufacturing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1908
- Stocking v. Seed Filter & Manufacturing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
- Fisse v. BlankeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1907