Thyssenkrupp Mexinox S.A. De C v. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
1Opinion of the Court
JUDGMENT
POGUE, Judge.
This action involves the distribution to affected domestic producers, pursuant to the Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act of 2000 (“CDSOA” or “Byrd Amendment”), section 754 of the Tariff Act, 19 U.S.C. § 1675c (2000), of antidumping (“AD”) duties assessed and collected on imports of certain steel products from Mexico. In their complaint, Plaintiffs claimed, correctly, that the Byrd Amendment may not be applied to AD duties on goods from Mexico. On the other hand, on May 13, 2009, the court denied Plaintiffs’ motion to amend their complaint to add (1) a cause of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Canadian Lumber Trade Alliance v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- Canadian Lumber Trade Alliance v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2006
- Canadian Lumber Trade Alliance v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2006
- Thyssenkrupp Mexinox S.A. De C v. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2009
- Thyssenkrupp Mexinox S.A. de C.V. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2009
3Cited by1 opinion
- Furniture Brands International, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2011