Legal Opinion

United States v. Malumphy

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided April 27, 1962No. 15,094PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum Opinion of the Court

Kilday, Judge:

After our decision in United States v Malumphy, 12 USCMA 639, 31 CMR 225, affirming his conviction for aggravated assault, but before promulgation of our mandate, accused filed a timely petition for new trial pursuant to the provisions of Article 73, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 873. Said petition was initially grounded upon accused’s allegation that trial counsel had entered into an attorney-client relationship with him with respect to the offenses he later prosecuted as trial counsel, the impropriety of which action accused did not…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Alcorta v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. United States v. MalumphyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1962
  3. United States v. NitschkeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1961

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. LoukasUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1990
  2. United States v. FisherUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1972
  3. United States v. BabbidgeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1969
  4. United States v. CollierU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1992
  5. United States v. CrossUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1964

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API