United States v. Malumphy
United States Court of Military Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum Opinion of the Court
Kilday, Judge:
After our decision in United States v Malumphy, 12 USCMA 639, 31 CMR 225, affirming his conviction for aggravated assault, but before promulgation of our mandate, accused filed a timely petition for new trial pursuant to the provisions of Article 73, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 873. Said petition was initially grounded upon accused’s allegation that trial counsel had entered into an attorney-client relationship with him with respect to the offenses he later prosecuted as trial counsel, the impropriety of which action accused did not…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Alcorta v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United States v. MalumphyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1962
- United States v. NitschkeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1961
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States v. LoukasUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1990
- United States v. FisherUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1972
- United States v. BabbidgeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1969
- United States v. CollierU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1992
- United States v. CrossUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1964
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.