Legal Opinion

Eaton v. Hewitt

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 6, 1933No. 24123. Department OnePublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

This action was instituted for the wrongful death of one W. H. Eaton, alleged to have been caused through the negligent operation of an automobile owned and driven by respondent. The action was brought by a son of the deceased as administrator of the estate and for the benefit of the surviving widow.

At the conclusion of appellant’s case in chief, a motion was made by respondent for a nonsuit or a peremptory instruction for a verdict in favor of respondent, upon the grounds that there was not sufficient evidence to sustain a verdict because of the negligence of respondent, and that the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hillebrant v. ManzWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Romano v. Short Line Stage Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Mattingley v. Oregon-Washington Railroad & Navigation Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Jensen v. CulbertWashington Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Hooven v. MoenWashington Supreme Court · 1928

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Morris v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific RailroadWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  2. McCoy v. CourtneyWashington Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Karp v. HerderWashington Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Smith v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Hinton v. CarmodyWashington Supreme Court · 1935

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API