Legal Opinion

State of Missouri v. Raymond Robinson, (and) State of Missouri v. Steve Lomax

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided February 9, 2016No. SC94936_and_SC94989PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtLaura Denvir Stith, Judge

The trial courts in both State v. Robinson and State v. Lomax held that article I, section 23 of the Missouri Constitution, as amended by .Amendment 5 adopted in 2014, does not permit the State to prohibit non-violent felons from bearing arms. On this basis these courts dismissed the criminal counts charging Mr. Robinson and Mr. Lomax with violating section 571.070.1,1 which prohibits them from carrying weapons due to their -have prior convictions for nonviolent felonies. The State appeals.

This Court reverses. This Court recently held in State v. Merritt, 467 S.W.3d 808 (Mo. banc 2015), and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. BartonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
  2. State v. VaughnSupreme Court of Missouri · 2012
  3. City of Arnold v. TourkakisSupreme Court of Missouri · 2008
  4. State of Missouri v. Santonio L. McCoySupreme Court of Missouri · 2015
  5. State v. PribbleSupreme Court of Missouri · 2009

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State ex rel. Kendrick Tipler, Relator v. The Honorable Michael GardnerSupreme Court of Missouri · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API