Legal Opinion

City of Arnold v. Tourkakis

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided March 18, 2008No. SC 88647PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARY R. RUSSELL, Judge.

The question in this case is whether the City of Arnold (“the City”), a non-charter city, is authorized to exercise the power of eminent domain. This Court holds that article VI, section 21 of the Missouri constitution and relevant statutes permit the City to do so. The judgment of the trial court is reversed, and the case is remanded.1

Homer and Julie Tourkakis (“Landowners”) own a residential building located in Arnold that was converted into a dentist’s office. The Arnold City Council adopted ordinances declaring Landowners’ property and the surrounding area to be…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Doe v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Missouri · 2006
  2. In Re Armory Site in Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1955
  3. Buechner v. BondSupreme Court of Missouri · 1983
  4. State ex inf. Danforth v. State Environmental Improvement AuthoritySupreme Court of Missouri · 1975
  5. Cape Motor Lodge, Inc. v. City of Cape GirardeauSupreme Court of Missouri · 1986

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. State v. HoneycuttSupreme Court of Missouri · 2013
  2. State v. VaughnSupreme Court of Missouri · 2012
  3. Committee for Educational Equality v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2009
  4. St. Louis County v. River Bend Estates Homeowners' Ass'nSupreme Court of Missouri · 2013
  5. In the Interest of B.H.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2011

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API