Legal Opinion

Hencely v. Fluor Corporation

District Court, D. South Carolina

Decided August 11, 2021No. 6:19-cv-00489Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA GREENVILLE DIVISION Winston Tyler Hencely, Civil Action No. 6:19-00489-BHH Plaintiff, v. OPINION AND ORDER Fluor Corporation; Fluor Enterprises, Inc.; Fluor Intercontinental, Inc.; Fluor Government Group International, Inc., Defendants. This matter is before the Court on Defendants Fluor Corporation, Fluor Enterprises, Inc., Fluor Intercontinental, Inc., and Fluor Government Group International, Inc.’s (collectively “Defendants” or “Fluor”) motion for summary judgment based on the Federal Tort Claims Act’s “combatant activities”…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Boyle v. United Technologies Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Anthony Dash v. Floyd Mayweather, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API