Legal Opinion
Schonfeldt v. State
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 9, 1998No. B110639PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GILBERT, J.
— A teenager climbs a freeway fence and runs across the freeway. He is struck by a truck and is seriously injured. This is a use of the . freeway without due care in a manner which is not reasonably foreseeable. Therefore, the State of California is not liable for his injury under the California Tort Claims Act.
Gary and Nancy Schonfeldt, as guardians ad litem for their son, Brian Schonfeldt, appeal from the judgment on the pleadings granted to respondent, the State of California. The Schonfeldts contend there are factual questions as to whether four alleged defects…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Peterson v. San Francisco Community College DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
- Baughman v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- Thomas v. City of RichmondCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Posey v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Hosne Chowdhury v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Huffman v. City of PowayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- Marin Ass'n of Public Employees v. Marin County Employees' Retirement Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- Brenner v. City of El CajonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- Milligan v. Golden Gate Bridge Highway & Transporation DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Disney v. City of ConcordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.