Legal Opinion
Nissen Trampoline Co. v. International Tram-po-line Manufacturers, Inc.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided November 18, 1960No. 60-C-843PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BARTELS, District Judge.
In an action for injunction and damages for alleged copyright and trademark violations, as well as for unfair competition, plaintiff moves for an injunction pendente lite (Rule 56, Fed.Rules Civ. Proc., 28 U.S.C.A.). Jurisdiction is based on the copyright and trademark laws of the United States; there is also diversity of citizenship.
*239At the hearing testimony was adduced which established the following: In 1935 George P. Nissen, president and general manager of the plaintiff, first introduced the sport of rebound tumbling to colleges and sports organizations and since…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Armstrong Paint & Varnish Works v. Nu-Enamel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Conde Nast Publications, Inc. v. Vogue School of Fashion Modelling, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1952
- Lone Ranger, Inc. v. CoxCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1942
- Weiner v. National Tinsel Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1941
- Iowa Farmers Union v. Farmers' Educational And Co-Operative Union Of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1957
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Coca-Cola Company v. Foods, Inc.District Court, D. South Dakota · 1963
- Flexitized, Inc. v. National Flexitized CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1963