Davis v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
HABPEB, Judge.
Appellant was prosecuted and convicted of slan<der, the information alleging that appellant did unlawfully orally, falsely, maliciously and wantonly impute to one Mrs. Jessie Davis a want of chastity, in that in the presence and hearing of W. H. Landrum, falsely, maliciously and wantonly say that Mrs. Jessie Davis was four months gone, meaning thereby that she was pregnant with child and had been for a period of four months, and by the language so used to the said W. H. Landrum that Mrs. Davis was unchaste and was not virtuous prior to her marriage to appellant’s son, and that…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Basquez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1909
3Cited by5 opinions
- Ecuyer v. New York Life InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1918
- Davis v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
- Texas Employers' Ins. Ass'n v. TeelCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
- Texas Employers' Ins. v. TeelCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
- Robison v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1915