Basquez v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
DAVIDSON, Peesiding Judge.
This conviction was for adultery, the punishment assessed being a fine of $100.
There is one bill of exceptions found in the record. This bill was reserved to the action of the court overruling motion for a new trial, and embodies the motion for a new trial. This does not add any strength to the grounds of the motion, and was not necessary. The motion for new trial contains four grounds, the first three of which criticise the court’s charge on circumstantial evidence. This conviction is for a misdemeanor. The rule in misdemeanor cases is, in order to have the charge…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Marshall v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1902
- Schoennerstedt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1909
- Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1902
3Cited by26 opinions
- Giles v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1912
- Parroccini v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1921
- Golden v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1912
- Gowans v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1912
- Singleton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1947
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.