Troy v. Todd
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
WELLS, Judge.
It is well established that a defendant’s motion for a directed verdict under N.C. Gen. Stat. § 1A-1, Rule 50(a) of the Rules of Civil Procedure “. . . tests the legal sufficiency of the evidence to take the case to the jury and support a verdict for the plaintiff. . . . On defendant’s motion for a directed verdict, plaintiffs evidence must be taken as true and all the evidence must be considered in the light most favorable to the plaintiff, giving him the benefit of every reasonable inference to be drawn therefrom.” (Citations omitted) Manganello v. Permastone, Inc., 291 N.C.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Manganello v. Permastone, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
- Clark v. BodycombeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- Blake v. MallardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- Price v. MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- Thornton v. CartwrightCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Meadows v. LawrenceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- Ligon v. MATTHEW ALLEN STRICKLANDCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
- Whitley v. OwensCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
- Phillips ex rel. Schultz v. HollandCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
- Meadows v. LawrenceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.