Legal Opinion

Marshall v. Boston & Maine Railroad

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided March 4, 1924Published

1Per curiam

The controversy relates to an occurrence in Vermont, and the rights of the parties, as fixed by what then happened, are determined by Vermont law. A nonsuit was ordered because under Vermont law the facts in proof conclusively established the contributory negligence of the deceased. This necessarily implies a determination by the trial court of Vermont law as applied to the facts in proof.

■ Foreign law is a matter of fact, determinable at the trial term. Connecticut &c. Co. v. Railroad, 78 N. H. 553, 557; Hansen v. Railway, 78 N. H. 518, 521, 523; Kimball v. Kimball, 75 N. H. 291, 292; Jenne…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Connecticut Valley Lumber Co. v. Maine Central RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1918
  2. Kimball v. KimballSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1909
  3. Hansen v. Grand Trunk Railway Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1917
  4. Jenne v. HarrisvilleSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1885

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API