Legal Opinion

Jenne v. Harrisville

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided June 5, 1885PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Case. The plaintiff is a citizen of Vermont, and questions were raised as to the law of that state.

1Opinion of the CourtDoe, C. J.

Foreign unwritten law, including the prevailing construction of a foreign statute, may be proved by competent witnesses, and is a matter of fact determinable at the trial term. Leach v. Pillsbury, 15 N. H. 137; Beach v. Workman, 20 N. H. 379; Watson v. Walker, 23 N. H. 471; Pickard v. Bailey, 26 N. H. 152 ; Holton v. Gleason, 26 N. H. 501; Emery v. Berry, 28 N. H. 485; Taylor v. Barron, 30 N. H. 100 ; Ferguson v. Clifford, 37 N. H. 87; Kennard v. Kennard [ante 303, 308] ; Dyer v. Smith, 12 Conn. 384; Holman v. King, 7 Met. 384; Kline v. Baker, 99 Mass. 253; 1 Gr. Ev., ss. 486, 488; Sto. Conf.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kline v. BakerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
  2. Dyer v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1837

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hansen v. Grand Trunk Railway Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1917
  2. Marshall v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API