Hansen v. Grand Trunk Railway Co.
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtWalker, J.
The plaintiff testified without objection from the defendant that while she was waiting at Port Hope she wrote a telegram to her sister in Berlin in the Norwegian language and at the request of the operator she translated it into English as follows: “The Grand Trunk conductor has put me on a wrong train. ” As the original telegram was not produced (and according to the defendant’s evidence it had been destroyed) one of the plaintiff’s witnesses subsequently produced the telegram received by her sister in Berlin, and, subject to the defendant’s exception, it was admitted in evidence. It…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Kennard v. KennardSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1884
- Challis v. LakeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1901
- Haskell v. Manchester Street RailwaySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1906
- State v. KennardSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1906
- Lemire v. PilawskiSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1913
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Smith v. BlinnSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
- State v. ThorpSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1934
- Stinson v. Maine Central RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1925
- Marshall v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1924