Legal Opinion
The Poznan
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 23, 1923PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LEARNED HAND, District Judge.
The Poznan, being owned by a Delaware corporation, was not in her home port while in New York, though there enrolled, The Plymouth Rock, 13 Blatchf. 505, Fed. Cas. No. 11,237; The Havana, 64 Fed. 496, 12 C. C. A. 361 (C. C. A. 2). A maritime lien for wharfage proper was therefore created, if the contract-did not preclude it, Ex Parte Easton, 95 U. S. 68, 24 L. Ed. 373. No one disputes that in a “foreign” port such a lien arises. Indeed, at least in this circuit, such a lien arises in the “home” port. The Scow No. 15, 92 Fed. 1008, 35 C. C. A. 149 (C. C. A. 2); The…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Ex Parte EastonSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Robinson v. The C. VanderbiltDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1898
- Carmona v. The Esteban de AntunanoU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Louisiana · 1887
- The Kate TremaineDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1871
- Putnam v. The Young AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1887
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- New York Dock Co. v. Steamship PoznanSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- In Re Queen Ltd.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1973
- Bassis v. Universal LineCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
- Bassis v. Universal Line, S.A.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
- The Western WaveDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1934