Legal Opinion

The Kate Tremaine

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided March 15, 1871PublishedCited by 22 opinions

In admiralty.

1Opinion of the Court

BENEDICT, District Judge.

This is a proceeding in rem to enforce a lien for wharfage against the canal-boat Kate Tremaine. It is admitted that the vessel in question was employed in transporting freight between the cities of New York, Brooklyn, and Albany, in the state of New York, and Jersey City, in the state of New Jersey. That, in the course of such employment, she was moored at the libellant’s wharf, on the Brooklyn side of the East river, and there discharged cargo, whereby the libellant became entitled to the wharf-age now sought to be recovered. It is also admitted that the vessel was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Brookman v. . HamillNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  2. Hecker v. New-York Balance Dock Co.New York Supreme Court · 1857
  3. Nicoll v. GardnerNew York Supreme Court · 1835

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Robinson v. The C. VanderbiltDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1898
  2. Carmona v. The Esteban de AntunanoU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Louisiana · 1887
  3. Vanhoesen v. The SegurancaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1893
  4. Mygatt v. KnappDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1889
  5. Laidlaw v. Oregon Ry. & Nav. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1897

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API