Bassis v. Universal Line, S.A.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1DissentMansfield, Circuit Judge
(dissenting) :
I respectfully dissent.
In my view the majority’s decision rewards the owner and creditors of a trespassing ship for the owner’s misconduct, which was permitted to continue with resulting benefit to the ship because the ship was in the district court’s custody. The effect is unjustly to enrich the shipowner and other creditors at the expense of the party wronged, in this case the City of New York. I believe the proper rule to be that where a ship in custodia, legis trespasses upon another’s wharf in order to gain resulting benefits, including protection from hurricanes, the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- New York Dock Co. v. Steamship PoznanSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- The PoznanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1925
- Larsen v. New York Dock Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
- Roy v. M/V KATERI TEKDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1965
- The St. PaulCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1921
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.