Legal Opinion

Hickok v. Diocese of Sioux Falls

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 23, 1935No. File No. 7784PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWarren, P. J.

The plaintiff as the owner and holder of a number of bonds issued by the defendant brought action to recover a money judgment thereon, in the sum of $2,926.20. From the record it appears that the defendant, the Diocese of Sioux Falls, a corporation, issued its serial .bonds, which bonds were secured by a deed of trust conveying real property to a trustee for the purpose of securing the bonds. The bonds were due and unpaid, and-after demand for payment thereof had been made plaintiff brought action against the defendant. The action is for a money judgment only; no relief in the way of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. McClure v. Township of OxfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Crosthwaite v. Moline Plow Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1924
  3. State v. ComerWashington Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Moody v. Pacific Steamship Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Boley v. Lake Street Elevated RailroadAppellate Court of Illinois · 1896

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Jepsen v. R.C., B.H. W.R. Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Jepsen v. Rapid City, Black Hills & Western RailroadSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API