Legal Opinion

Hockenhull v. Bowen

District Court, D. Colorado

Decided October 20, 1989No. Civ. A. 89-K-164PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER AND JUDGMENT ON APPEAL

KANE, Senior District Judge.

This is an appeal from a final decision of the defendant Secretary under the Social Security Act. This court has jurisdiction pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). It is conceded that the decision appealed from is the final decision of the Secretary.

I have examined the entire record on appeal and reviewed the briefs filed by the parties. Accordingly, I find that oral argument would not be of material benefit in deciding this appeal and therefore dispense with it.

In 1987, Carla Hockenhull applied for disability insurance benefits. At the time…

2Cases cited12 opinions

Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
Glen W. WILLIAMS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Otis R. BOWEN, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
Luna v. BowenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
L.B. LOVELACE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Otis R. BOWEN, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
Evelyn Grace DAWKINS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Otis R. BOWEN, Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

Brant v. BarnhartDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2007
Gomez v. SullivanDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1991