Roncace v. Welsh (Yurkovsky)
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Parker, J.,
This is an action in trespass to recover damages for breaking and entering plaintiffs’ close and involves the legal principles applicable to an action quare clausum fregit, as employed prior to the Practice Act of 1887: Griffin v. Delaware & H. Co., 257 Pa. 432, 437, 101 A. 750. It concerns the location of the division line between properties of the plaintiffs and the defendants, that of the plaintiffs lying to the west and that of the defendants to the east. Claim was also made for double and treble damages under the provisions of Act of May 8, 1876, P. L. 142 (18 PS…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Guilinger v. Pennsylvania R. R. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
- Irwin v. PatchenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1894
- Penn v. PrestonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1829
- Forsyth v. WellsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1862
- Gotshall v. J. Langdon & Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1901
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Florig v. Estate of O'HaraSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Potts Run Coal Co. v. Benjamin Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Link v. Mauz (In re Mauz)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2013
- Volpe v. Atlantic Crushed Coke Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
- Haan v. Wells, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lackawanna County2013
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.