Legal Opinion
United States v. Venske
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided July 12, 2002No. 99-2214, 01-10345PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COX, Circuit Judge:
William. McCorkle, Chantal McCorkle, Brian Higgins, and Herman Venske (the “Defendants”) appeal their convictions and sentences for their participation in a fraudulent telemarketing scheme. William and Chantal contend- that the court erred .in denying their motions for a new trial and an evidentiary hearing based on allegations of juror misconduct and extrinsic influence on jurors. Because we find that the court did not abuse its discretion in denying their motions, we affirm their convictions. Nevertheless, because we conclude that the court erred in sentencing William and…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Tanner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- McDonald v. PlessSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Parker v. GladdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. Jennifer AguillardCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2000
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- United States v. BradleyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011
- Meier Jason Brown v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2013
- United States v. Don Eugene SiegelmanCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011
- United States v. George R. CavalloCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2015
- United States v. Philip N. AnticoCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2019
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.