Horton v. Continental Casualty Company
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Atkinson, Justice.
(After stating the foregoing facts.) ' Whether this court has jurisdiction of the case within the meaning of the constitutional provision contained in the Code, § 2-3005, depends on whether or not this is an equity case. “While the doctrine of contribution originated in courts of equity, it was subsequently adopted by courts of law and is now universally applied therein.” 13 Am. Jur. 8, § 5. See also 18 C. J. S. 21, § 13. This principle was recognized in Watkins v. Woodbery, 148 Ga. 249 (96 S. E. 338), where several joint makers of promissory notes sought contribution…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Southern Railway Co. v. City of RomeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934
- Eidson v. MaddoxSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
- Martin v. Home Owners Loan CorporationSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
- Atlanta Finance Company v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
- Autry v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1928
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Horton v. Continental Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1945