Rogers v. Hill

Harsha, Judge.'

Brenda and Danny Rogers appeal the judgment of the Municipal Court of Chillieothe and assign the following error:

“The trial court erred in holding that the defects in the premises were neither latent nor coupled with any affirmative misrepresentation or concealment.”

The appellants purchased residential property from appellee, Nellie Hill, in 1995. Appellee completed and signed a residential property disclosure form as required by R.C. 5302.30. In that form, appellee acknowledged that the “shower need (sic) drain valve.” She also commented under the “Basement/Crawl Space”…