Legal Opinion

Layman v. Western Savings Bank

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 30, 1982No. 1293 and 2386PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MONTEMURO, Judge:

The instant action presents the problem of deciding which of two innocent parties suffers a loss when a fiduciary is a thief. Appellant herein is the administrator of an estate who opened an estate account at the appellee bank, Western Savings. Appellee disbursed funds from the account when the attorney for the estate presented the passbook together with a withdrawal slip correctly signed by appellant himself. The court below entered judgment in favor of the bank-appellee and against the administrator-appellant and we affirm.

The appellant first contacted another attorney to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bulakowski v. Philadelphia Saving Fund SocietySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  2. Blose EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  3. Burrill v. Dollar Savings BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1879
  4. Armstrong v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1959
  5. Henry Armstrong, Administrator of the Estate of Ella Armstrong, Deceased v. United States v. Carrie Holmes and Sarah Duhart, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1960

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Robinson Protective Alarm Co. v. Bolger & PickerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  2. Morgan v. First Pennsylvania BankSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. Robinson Protective Alarm Co. v. Bolger & PickerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API