Legal Opinion

Robinson Protective Alarm Co. v. Bolger & Picker

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 3, 1986No. 75 E.D. Appeal Docket 1985Published

1Opinion of the Court

512 Pa. 116 (1986)

516 A.2d 299

ROBINSON PROTECTIVE ALARM COMPANY

v.

BOLGER & PICKER, Appellee,

v.

Richard ROBINSON and Continental Bank, Appellants.

Appeal of CONTINENTAL BANK.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Argued January 22, 1986.

Decided October 3, 1986.

Marvin Comisky, Ronald H. Surkin, Victor A. Young, Philadelphia, for appellants.

Richard M. Jordan, Brent S. Gorey, Philadelphia, for Bolger & Picker.

Before NIX, C.J., and LARSEN, FLAHERTY, McDERMOTT, HUTCHINSON, ZAPPALA and PAPADAKOS, JJ.

OPINION

NIX, Chief Justice.

The pivotal question raised in this appeal is the applicability of section 2 of the…

Also in this document: Concurrence · Hutchinson; Concurrence · Papadakos.

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Schaffer v. LarzelereSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  2. Commonwealth v. Rieck Investment Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  3. Posternack v. Am. Cas. Co. of ReadingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  4. Chatham Communications, Inc. v. General Press Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  5. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Fox v. SwingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API