Adlaka v. Giannini, Unpublished Decision (9-1-2006)
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
{¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellant Sat Adlaka appeals the decision of the Mahoning County Common Pleas Court which dismissed his complaint in favor of defendant-appellee Attorney Matthew Giannini. The main issue is whether the court was permitted to dismiss the action where appellee did not specifically seek Civ.R. 12(B) dismissal in the motion he filed prior to answering. There is also the issue of appellant's motion for sanctions. Although Attorney Giannini's procedures were flawed in various ways, the judgment of the trial court dismissing this action and denying sanctions is hereby affirmed.
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Perrysburg Township v. City of RossfordOhio Supreme Court · 2004
- State ex rel. Seikbert v. WilkinsonOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- Cincinnati v. Beretta U.S.A. Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 2002
- State ex rel. Kreps v. ChristiansenOhio Supreme Court · 2000
- Petrey v. SimonOhio Supreme Court · 1983
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Cline v. Mtge. Electronic Registration Sys., Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2013
- Gasper v. Bank of Am., N.A.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2019
- Dombroski v. Wellpoint, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
- Radtke v. Chester Twp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2015
- Paczewski v. Antero Resources Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2019
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.