Legal Opinion

People v. Perez

California Supreme Court

Decided June 21, 1973No. Crim. 16699PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

McCOMB, J.

By an information, defendant and Curtis Vann were charged with sodomy (Pen. Code, § 286), and Carlos Rodriguez was charged with attempted sodomy and assault with intent to commit that offense. At defendant’s request, his case was severed. After a court trial, he was found guilty of sodomy, and a jury subsequently found that he was sane at the time of the commission of the offense. He appeals from the judgment of conviction thereafter entered.

Facts: Viewed in the light most favorable to the People (People v. Sweeney, 55 Cal.2d 27, 33 [1] [9 Cal.Rptr. 793, 357 P.2d 1049]), the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. People v. WolffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  2. People v. SweeneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  3. People v. WestekCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  4. United States Ex Rel. Darcy v. HandySupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  5. Bardessono v. MichelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. People v. MayberryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  2. State v. CrenshawWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  3. People v. CasaresCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016
  4. People v. PitmonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  5. Shea v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API