Legal Opinion

Clay County v. Burlington Northern, Inc.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 6, 1973No. 43383PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

This negligence action was brought by Clay County, a municipal corporation, to recover for damages to a road grader owned by it and operated by one of its employees. Plaintiff contends on this appeal 1 that the trial court erred in not applying the holding of this court in Weber v. Stokely-Van Camp, Inc. 274 Minn. 482, 144 N. W. 2d 540 (1966), to the present case.

The matter came before the trial court on a stipulation of facts which established that on May 8, 1970, plaintiff owned a road grader, a motorized piece of heavy equipment used for road maintenance. On the day in question, Leonard…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Weber v. Stokely-Van Camp, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
  2. Pierson v. EdstromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Dehn v. ProutySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Thomas Oil, Inc. v. OnsgaardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
  3. Smedsrud v. BrownSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  4. Weckerly v. AbearSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  5. Dehn v. ProutySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API