Weckerly v. Abear
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
YETKA, Justice.
This is an appeal from a judgment against the appellant following a jury trial in District Court, Cass County. The appellant proprietorship sought to recover damages for property damage to his truck following a two-vehicle collision. The truck was driven by the appellant’s employee. The jury found the employee 60-percent causally negligent. The district court imputed the negligence of the employee to the appellant and thus denied recovery. We affirm.
The sole issue presented by this appeal is whether the doctrine of Weber v. Stokely-Van Camp, Inc., 274 Minn. 482, 144 N.W.2d 540…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Weber v. Stokely-Van Camp, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
- Pierson v. EdstromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
- Nagele-Kelly Manufacturing Co. v. HannakMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
- Thomas Oil, Inc. v. OnsgaardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
- Clay County v. Burlington Northern, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Dehn v. ProutySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
- Iepson v. NorenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Bibergal v. McCormickCivil Court of the City of New York · 1979
- Dehn v. ProutySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982