Legal Opinion

Smedsrud v. Brown

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 21, 1975No. 45041PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Todd, Justice.

Defendant appeals from an order for judgment entered in favor of plaintiff-bailor for property damage arising out of a collision between an automobile driven by defendant and plaintiff’s automobile, which was being driven by his bailee. In a prior proceeding, defendant was found to be 15-percent negligent and the bailee was found to be 85-percent negligent. Defendant seeks to limit his liability for property damage to the percentage of his negligence and asks that we reverse our prior rulings that the negligence of a bailee is not to be imputed to the bailor in a suit by the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Christensen v. Hennepin Transportation Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
  2. Weber v. Stokely-Van Camp, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
  3. Schweidler v. CarusoWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Clay County v. Burlington Northern, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1973

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Schechter v. Illinois, Department of Revenue (In Re Markos Gurnee Partnership)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1995
  2. Dehn v. ProutySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Weckerly v. AbearSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  4. Dehn v. ProutySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API