Legal Opinion

Kalk v. Village of Woodmere

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 18, 1985No. 49670PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPatton, J.

Plaintiff-appellant, Joseph Kalk, appeals from the decision of the Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas which denied his motion for summary judgment and granted summary judgment in favor of defendants-appel-lees, the village of Woodmere (“Wood-mere”) and various individuals associated with Woodmere’s government.

Appellant filed the instant lawsuit on December 9, 1982, alleging false imprisonment, assault and battery and violations of his federal constitutional rights under Section 1983, Title 42, U.S. Code stemming from a December 7, 1982 Woodmere Council meeting from which he was ejected.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Owen v. City of IndependenceSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Whitney v. City of WorcesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  3. Haverlack v. Portage Homes, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Enghauser Manufacturing Co. v. Eriksson Engineering Ltd.Ohio Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Victor Havas and Arlene Havas v. John T. ThorntonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Chalker v. Howland Township Board of TrusteesTrumbull County Court of Common Pleas · 1995
  2. City of Dayton v. EsratiOhio Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. In Re 1345 Main Partners, Ltd.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API