Legal Opinion
Andrew L. Weems v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided August 9, 2018No. 15-CM-234PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Concurring opinion by Associate Judge Easterly at page 308.
Glickman, Associate Judge:
*299Andrew Weems appeals his convictions after a bench trial of shoplifting and attempted threats to do bodily harm. He contends the trial judge erred by (1) not sanctioning the government for its failure to preserve and produce discoverable evidence; and (2) permitting the government to amend the information before trial to reduce the threats charges against him and thereby eliminate his statutory entitlement to a trial by jury. We reject appellant's claims of error and affirm his convictions.
I
Appellant was…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Arizona v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. BrazelCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
- In Re Bankers Trust CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. SarrasCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2009
- United States v. Jose Carlos Chavez-Vernaza, AKA Jose Chavez, AKA "Pepe"Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Rahman v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2019
- Michael A. Jones v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2019
- Corey D. Askew v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2020
- Crocker & Walker v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2021
- Howard v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2020
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.