Legal Opinion

United States v. Jose Carlos Chavez-Vernaza, AKA Jose Chavez, AKA "Pepe"

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 5, 1988No. 86-3178, 86-3187PublishedCited by 116 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALLACE, Circuit Judge:

Chavez-Vernaza (Chavez) appeals from his convictions for engaging in various drug-related activities, including possession and distribution of cocaine, in violation of the Comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Act, 21 U.S.C. § 801 et seq. He argues that reversal is required because the district court failed to suppress financial records introduced against him at trial, refused to allow him to examine pre-sentence reports of government witnesses, denied his motion to seat Black jurors peremptorily challenged by the prosecutor, forbade cross-examination…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. United States v. YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Pennsylvania v. RitchieSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by116 opinions

  1. Samuel Martinez-Serrano v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  2. United States v. Michael JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  3. United States v. Peter John CormierCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  4. United States v. Francisco Javier Alvarez, A.K.A. Frank Javier Alvarez, United States of America v. Richard ValenzuelaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  5. United States v. BrazelCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997

111 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API